Quantcast
Channel: presidentialrace
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 134

Aggregating the Presidential Aggregators - Sept. 16, 2016

$
0
0

It’s been a stressful week watching the polls as the presidential race continues to tighten and the media in my opinion continues to apply a double standard when it comes to how they cover Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

today_2016-09-16.JPG
NYT Upshot forecasters’ current consensus of the Electoral College results as of September 16, 2016.

For over a month now I’ve been looking at the New York Times’Upshot polls where they aggregate the analysis by the data modelers and forecasters, and trying to get their consensus opinion. I call it Aggregating the Presidential Aggregators, and I also have a weekly companion diary for Aggregating the Senate Aggregators

As a quick recap: the New York Timescollects data from data modelers (the New York TimesFiveThirtyEightDailyKos, and the Princeton Election Consortium), knowledgeable experts (the Cook Political Report,Rothenberg & Gonzales Political Report, and Sabato’s Crystal Ball), and PredictWise’s betting markets data. I then aggregate all of that to see what the state-by-state consensus is. 

Seven states had movement this week, none in our favor. They still show Clinton with an Electoral College majority without Tossups, but barely.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 134

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>